The model herself is beautiful; just tanned enough to stand out from the background, but light skinned enough so that the highlights on her skin complement the warm white of the background fabric. While slender, she seems bereft of harsh angles and visible bone structure, which serves to add to the femininity of the subject. Her pose is a compilation of triangles, the curve of her body, the arrangement of her elbows, that all seem to bring the focus back to the model.
My eyes go first to her hair and eyes, with her hair/face/body then serving as a top/left to bottom/right path, highlighted by the added pop of the white garter on her leg. The nudity is mostly implied, making it all the more beautiful.
You're a fucking idiot for even trying to use that tactic against me. There's a fine line between posting pictures of your cat for your friends to enjoy, and someone posting a naked woman lying on a sheet. I'm not looking for popularity by posting naked shit like these people are which is most likely why they post it and guess what people buy into it and it winds up on the front page because omg tits. Seriously how can you people sit there day in and day out and call this blatant playboy material art? I can't understand how something I can find on Brazzers is considered an artistic piece....I've seen ACTUAL artistic nudes where the model is painted to represent a theme or props are used and just making a woman lie on a white sheet is both lazy and screaming "look at my nakedness!" and no I will not turn off my filter because I am an adult as such I do like to look at the actual PAINTED and DRAWN ART on this site seeing as it is supposed to be an art site. So you can get your smart ass off my profile and shut the fuck up about someone having an opinion on something.
Tell me. If you think a woman's naked body is vulgar and inappropriate for this site, how do you excuse your childish language? Your vindictive attitude is the only thing on this page that doesn't belong on DA. And guess what, DA is not Tumblr or Facebook. It's not for sharing random snapshots with your friends. The fact that you'd even try to justify those stupid cat pics on Deviant ART while at the same time tearing down the piece above, solely because there's nudity in it, invalidates whatever facet of an argument you think you might have here.
So by your logic, only *you* can decide what is and isn't art, and only *you* can post snapshots with no artistic intention on an art website, so long as they don't become popular (I guess you wouldn't ever have to worry about that though). Interesting character flaws you got there.
And good lord, don't hide behind the "opinion" defense. You can't afford to trash any more of your credibility than you already have. Opinions, if that's what you call them, are a two-way street. Don't whine and throw insults around, and then wave that flag. You clearly wanted to ruffle feathers.